|
|
A CAPTURE-MARK-RECAPTURE STUDY
OF STAG BEETLES IN COLCHESTER During May 15 – August 12 2007 stag beetles, Lucanus cervus L. (Coleoptera: Lucanidae), were monitored in a suburban area in south-west Colchester, Essex. This area happens to be in one of Clark’s kilometre squares, TL9824, or “CRGS”, the acronym for Colchester Royal Grammar School, where he was a biology teacher. Clark was the first person to study stag beetles in Colchester (Clark, 1964, 1965). In 1996 there was another survey, with also good records for this area (Bowdrey, 1997).
Total stag beetle sightings 384: 270 males, 98 females and 16 unknown; female-to-male ratio 1 : 2.8.
Table 1
The majority of beetles, 204 sightings (53%), were found in Cambridge Walk (CW), an alleyway running between established back gardens which acts as a natural trap. The first males were sighted there on May 18, and hung around for a few days. Soon after the first female was sighted, May 30, the males became extremely mobile seeking them, particularly in the vicinity of three nests, where many fights and a few matings were observed. All nests except one are fairly recent: nest a is in a front garden in the in the roots of a holly (Ilex aquifolium) tree, felled Nov 2005; nest b, also in a front garden, is in birch (Betula sp.) tree roots, felled over 10 years ago; nest c is in the author’s back garden against the fence to CW, in two cherry (Prunus sp.) tree stumps which were felled in 2002 and 2005; and nest d is in the roots of a sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) tree felled in 2002 which is right by some railings in CW. Stag beetle larvae have been found in all nests except nest b. See in Figure 1 how close they are. Discussion
The year 2007 was exceptionally good for stag beetles in the monitored area, the record 384 sightings allowed for interesting analysis of the data, in particular for the females which are always outnumbered by the males (Fremlin, 2008). Despite the fact that the methodology was quite different the present urban study compares remarkably well with the study of a village garden 18 Km northeast of Colchester, in Bentley, Suffolk, with an established nest during the previous year (Hawes, 2006). Results of both studies are shown on Table 2. Table 2
There is great similarity between results on both sites. First, in both studies, as expected, more males than females were marked; note that the female-to-male ratio was the same. The percentage of recaptured beetles in the Bentley garden was higher than in Colchester which was to be expected as there the beetles were much more thoroughly monitored. Unlike in Colchester, there they were trapped and searched for under logs; plus their flight was intercepted with a long net and in Colchester it was only by hand. What is interesting though is that in both studies there was no sex bias in the percentages of the recaptured beetles. Indeed this was evident in the Colchester study for the percentage of marked beetles, which was respectively 43% and 44%. This interesting result would deserve further analysis as it raises a few questions. For instance, are there any other capture-mark-release studies of sexually dimorphic species showing the same results?
Conclusion This unique study shows that forty four years on from the first survey in the area (Clark, 1964), stag beetles continue to thrive in south-west Colchester. People are always felling trees in their gardens thus providing L. cervus with ideal continuous stepping stones well below the 500 to 1000 m distance recommended by Rink (2007). Moreover it is now known that stag beetles are guided by an acute sense of smell, ( Harvey, 2007), which undoubtedly helps the females with their quick colonization of new nesting sites. Ranius (2006) suggests that species in more permanent habitats have relatively limited dispersal; possibly this explains the success of L. cervus in favoured urban areas where becoming isolated doesn’t seem to be such a threat. However the ever present threat is urban development, unfortunately. Acknowledgements I wish to thank Colin Hawes for correspondence regarding his study; also to Thomas Ranius for comments on dispersal studies. I am very grateful to Marcos Mendéz for his stimulating interest on everything that I do with stag beetles; and above all to my husband, David Fremlin, for putting me in the right track in 2005. References Bowdrey, J. 1997 - The stag beetle (Lucanus cervus) L. in north-east Essex: Results of the 1996 Colchester "Search for Stag Beetles" survey. Essex Naturalist, 1997, 79-88. Clark, J.T. 1964 - The stag beetle in north-east Essex. The Essex Naturalist 31(3): 167-172. Clark, J.T. 1965 - The stag beetle in north-east Essex - second report. Essex Naturalist 31(4): 267-270. Fremlin, M. 2008 - Stag beetle (Lucanus cervus, (L., 1758), Lucanidae) Urban Behaviour. 5th Conference on Saproxylic Beetles, 14 -16 June 2008, Leuphana Universtiy, Germany, in preparation. Harvey, D. 2007 - Aspects of the Biology and Ecology of the Stag Beetle (Lucanus cervus). PhD thesis. Hawes, C. J. 2006- A CAPTURE-MARK-RECAPTURE STUDY OF STAG BEETLES, White Admiral, 65, November 2006, http://www.boxvalley.co.uk/nature/sns/wad65/W65-16.asp Mendéz, M. as of May 2008 - How to mark Lucanidae for studies of capture-mark-recapture http://entomologia.rediris.es/gtli/engl/four/d/marking.htm Ranius, T. 2006 - Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Population Ecology 48: 177–188. Rink, M. and U. Sinsch 2007 - Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation. Journal of Zoology 272 (3), 235-243. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00282.x
AUTHOR: Maria Fremlin |
