Summer 2004

Something to cheer about

The photographic and drawing competitions the Society held in conjunction with the  EADT  as  part  of  insect  week  were  very  well  supported.  Together,  the  three competitions attracted 60 entries. The standard was very high in all categories, so much so that the judges decided to create a Highly Commended award in addition to the three main prizes, and even then some super contributions did not get a prize. Two  of  the  categories  were  for  youngsters  only,  so  there  is  a  new  generation  of naturalists coming up after all! Congratulations to the winners and well done to all the entrants!

 

Grey squirrels – better than no squirrels?

As long as I can remember the grey squirrel has had a bad press but now, drummed up by those with a commercial interest in forestry, it has intensified into a campaign of  vilification.  It  has  been  tried  before  –  several  years  ago  MAFF  attempted  to change the common name to ‘tree rat’ in order to alter perceptions of the animal.  Is this going too far?

The  theory  that  the  grey  has  displaced  our  native  red  squirrel  by  competing  for food, is too simple an explanation on its own. Research is still continuing into the proposition that the grey brought the parapox virus that kills reds.  The red squirrel suffered  a  major  decline  in  numbers  in  the  1940s  and  1950s.  Records  show  that reds and greys lived alongside one another for a time. One reason that reds disappear is reduced reproductive success rather than reduced survival – they are just not reproducing fast enough to replace themselves, and the reasons are complex. It does seem  clear  that  what  the  reds  need  is  extensive  conifer  forests  that  are  devoid  of broad-leaved tree species. This could give them a competitive edge over their larger cousins.

Yes,  the  grey  squirrel  is  a  pest.  Foresters  and  ornithologists,  because  of  the damage  squirrels  do  to  young  trees  and  seeds  and  birds,  dislike  them.  However, even pest species are entitled to be killed in a humane way. The dilemma of how to kill a trapped one (it is illegal to release one once captured) needs removing by clearer advice that is easily available.  Abusive publicity encourages some people to feel justified in using cruel and illegal means to kill the animal.

 

The  grey  squirrel  provides  opportunities  to  observe  the  characteristics  and behaviour of a wild mammal easily and at close quarters. It is more or less the only wild species that most people see, and what they see is not a bad advert for the rest of the mammal class. Watching their antics provides a lot of pleasure for many.

Owing  to  other  factors  it  seems  that  if  the  grey  squirrel  were  exterminated  in Britain the red squirrel might not extend its range. Even if it did, we would not see it in parks and gardens – red squirrels are timid and inhabit the tops of trees, rarely coming  to  the  ground;  grey  squirrels  are  bold  and  spend  a  lot  of  time  on   terra firma, which enables us to see them close up.

There is no doubt that the grey squirrel has a significant impact on woodland biodiversity and that the issue is complex and not fully understood. Surely what is required, before millions, or even billions, of pounds are invested in an eradication programme,  is  more  fact-finding  followed  by  balanced  discussion  -  certainly  not  a hate campaign that ignores reason and appeals only to primitive instincts.

Click here to view the latest distribution maps for Grey and Red squirrel in Suffolk. And if you can see a 'dot' missing for Greys (or even Reds) then please send details in to the SBRC at the Ipswich Museum.

 

Thank you, Sicklesmere correspondent

Avid readers of ‘A Sicklesmere Garden’ will be sorry to learn that Stan Dumican has decided that he has too many commitments competing for his time and so is retiring from writing for  White  Admiral. ‘Sicklesmere’ has been a regular feature since Spring 1999. Stan has given a lot of time to the Society over the years. He is a past Chairman and former member of Council. We are immensely grateful to him for his enthusiasm, time and energy, and other contributions such as many fine photographs, and not least, the wisdom he imparts. We wish him great success in his other naturalist roles and hope to receive reports from time to time.

David Walker

© 2004   Suffolk Naturalists' Society

DHTML menus from Visit www.milonic.com used by kind permision.